6 Essential Reasons Why A Single Cloud Services Provider Is All You Need | business services

Going ahead with a single cloud services provider offers numerous benefits for your business ranging from enhanced commitment to transparency. A majority of the enterprises prefer to have it since it helps them manage contacts with other channel partners too. However there are mainly six reasons why businesses prefer them.Reduce the burden of IT departmentIt is among the most important advantage for your enterprise. The IT department of your company can focus more on generating good business value rather than spending most of the time managing the hardware. More than hardware troubles, the complexity of dealing with multiple SLAs from multiple vendors that makes use of varied technologies and interfaces is yet another difficulty that can be avoided by partnering up with such service providers of cloud computing.Ease of responsibility among the employeesPartnering with multiple providers of cloud services can raise confusion especially during circumstances in which something goes wrong with your network and the lack of a disaster recovery plan being assigned to a particular provider. Integration and accountability can be maintained with the provider taking the complete responsibility through hosting and networking and thereby maintaining the service quality across the whole of the infrastructure.Solutions for problems can be easily identifiedPartnering with multiple service providers of cloud technology will not provide businesses with a comprehensive service wrap or an assurance regarding end-to-end responsibility. However with a single provider, businesses can have a single point of contact at all times whether it is about migrating, scaling of the infrastructure, application management or on-boarding. A provider will take the full accountability of all kind of cloud services. Businesses can also avoid situations wherein providers blame each other whenever an issue comes up especially if businesses are partnered with more than one provider for cloud service.InteroperabilityThe success of business services and resources depends up on how effective you are able to co-ordinate with your provider. The presence of multiple providers can hamper the level of integration and the presence of any standardization measures. A single provider of cloud service also allows seamless communication using popular communication services such as email, Voice and Instant Messaging applications. Moreover extra precautions should be taken by companies by focusing more on the security and compliance concerns while sharing the applications and sensitive data across varied services.Lower CostsGetting associated with a single provider in cloud computing also saves a lot of money for the enterprise. Businesses can negotiate for bundled services from a single provider at a cost-effective price. Staff costs associated with the IT department can be reduced and even the finance team has to spend less time when it comes to reconciling the budgets. Employees can improve their efficiency as they can easily integrate in to new services as the business grows without spending much time in management of the multiple patches as well as upgrades that occur across more than one portal.ReliableSingle cloud service providers are reliable starting from initial consulting to the solution design and from service management to network management.

Web Design and Navigation | web design and development

As people “browse” the Web, they “land” on a page and “navigate” on a website. To find their way around they need a “navigation” system. Navigation is as important for web design as for a real life drive: when you drive on a new road you want to see clear marked destinations, exits and parking lots. You want to know where you are and where you go. So do your visitors. Fail to provide a clear road map and they will go back to where they came from. Navigation should be clear and simple. Or better: standard. That means: don’t go around renaming buttons. Use “home” for your index; not “back to base”. Although this “back to base” is rather clear, not all the web users are in the mood for riddles, nor do they have the time to start learning your rules, your style, or your symbols.There are three major types of navigation: global, local and hierarchical.Web designers use global navigation for medium-sized and small websites to categorize the main points of interest. Hierarchical navigation refers to large websites – such as web directories, article directories, news portals and so on. This approach is somehow confusing for web novices: they cannot really find their way, especially when the navigational structure is not clear (some web designers omit important navigational elements such as “you are here”, “back”, “next page” etc.)One important note about local navigation: it works great when you need cross traffic. You could use embedded links to lead your visitors to information that is somewhere else on your website or on a different website. But if you need to link to another website use a target=”_blank” approach that will open the link in a new window. That’s how the visitors will not lose the path back to your website.Many times web designers use a mix of the three navigational styles, depending on the size of a website, its categories and the importance of these categories. As a rule all sites have a global navigation principle: the navigation bar. Standard placements of the navigation bar are on the top or along the left side of the screen. Some designers place the nav bar on the right side – but users are not really familiar with this approach. The worse practice is promoted by flash designers who ignore web usability standards and make the visitors “guess” where the links are.No matter where you want to place the nav bar, remember: keep it simple. Take a look at the websites of big corporations. For example Philips placed the nav bar at the top to define the main categories and uses a java script to help users navigate to particular points of interest. On secondary pages Philips is using a left navigation bar. All in one, the web designers that created the website for Philips used all three major types of navigation, but the design respects one radical principle: “Sense and simplicity”. That’s right: Philips’ slogan applies perfectly as a fundamental rule when it comes to web design.

Food For Thought – The Meat Production Process Is So Wasteful And Costly | Livestock

According to Harvard nutritionist Jean Mayer, we would have enough food for the entire developing world if we ate half as much meat. Reducing meat production by merely 10 percent could release enough grain and other natural foods to feed 60 million people! Albert Einstein had this to say about vegetarianism: “Nothing will benefit human health and increase the chance for survival on Earth as much as the evolution to a vegetarian diet.” He predicted that producing and eating so much meat would literally kill us and our environment. Leo Tolstoy stated, “Vegetarianism is the taproot of humanitarianism.”The world’s output of meat increased fivefold in the second half of the 20th century. Given the current trend, by 2050, the increases in meat production will have reached a point where we could feed 4 billion extra people with the plant food that is now being used to raise cattle. Only 10 percent of the protein and calories we feed to our livestock are recovered in the meat we eat. In the case of the United States, for the 20 million tons of humanly edible and nutritious protein that is fed to livestock yearly (apart from the waste products and drugs), only about 2 million tons of meat protein are obtained; and out of that amount, less than 27 percent can be utilized by the human body. If you are concerned about the world’s survival, consider the following statistics:One acre of grain produces 5 times more protein than an acre of pasture set aside for meat production. An acre of beans or peas produces 10 times more protein and an acre of spinach 28 times more protein. Almost all land can be used for growing some crop or another.One portion of meat contains only 20 grams of protein, whereas a typical 100-gram portion of beans yields 35 grams of protein. The meat, however, costs about 20 times more than the beans do. Being a vegetarian saves not only lives, but also money.The food energy supplied by meat production uses 10 times more fossil fuel than the food energy supplied by plant production. Given the current shortage of fossil fuels on the planet, meat production may soon become unaffordable.The world’s livestock now produces at least 10 percent of all the greenhouse gases. In other words, emissions from livestock have become a significant source of atmospheric methane. As of 1990, domestic animals currently account for about 15 percent of the annual anthropogenic methane emissions, and the number has been steadily increasing ever since.85 percent of the topsoil lost in the USA each year is directly associated with the raising of livestock. In this way, 4 million acres of cropland is destroyed every year. In the same way, precious rain forests have had to give way to satisfy the demand for more meat in the world.To grow one pound of wheat requires only 60 pounds of water, whereas the production of one pound of meat requires a staggering 50,000 pounds of water. To produce one pound of chicken, 1,800 pounds of water are needed. Large chicken slaughtering plants, in fact, expend up to 100 million gallons of water daily, enough to supply a city of 25,000 people!According to research published in Chemical & Engineering News, Vol. 85, No. 15, April 9, 2007: 34-35, roxarsone, an arsenic-based additive used in most chicken feed, could pose health risks to humans. Roxasone is used to promote growth, kill parasites and improve the color of chicken meat. Under certain conditions, which can occur within live chickens or on farm land, this compound converts into more toxic forms of inorganic arsenic. This form of arsenic has been linked to bladder, lung, skin, kidney and colon cancers, and low-level exposure can lead to partial paralysis and diabetes. Of course, arsenic is also a deadly poison. Over 70 percent of the 9 billion broiler chickens produced annually in the United States are fed roxarsone.The meat production process is so wasteful and costly that, in order to survive, the meat industry needs hundreds of millions of dollars in tax subsidies every year. You never pay only for the meat you eat; the subsidies come out of your pocket. In 1977, the governments of Western Europe spent almost half a billion dollars purchasing farmers’ overproduction of meat and additional millions to store it. This trend has not been different in the United States and is worsening each year. All this is precious money lost, thereby heavily burdening every national economy. In this sense, meat consumption is directly impoverishing the wealthy nations.Any wars fought in the future will revolve about energy, food and water, all three of which are heavily wasted through meat production. The worldwide increase of meat consumption is driving the world closer and closer to the brink of international conflict.